[CLIO] Serum Cover Skin Tint SPF 20 PA+++ 30ml and VT Cosmetics PDRN Essence Glow Sun Pact SPF 50+ PA+++ (10g / 0.35 oz) share 14 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 14[CLIO] Serum Cover Skin Tint SPF 20 PA+++ 30ml only 33VT Cosmetics PDRN Essence Glow Sun Pact SPF 50+ PA+++ (10g / 0.35 oz) only 15
Permalink for this comparison →
23%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows. Partial captures footnoted under the board.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Serum · size not on the record | Serum · size not on the record |
| Brand origindiffers | Not recorded | Korean |
Offers | ||
| Where to buydiffers | $22.50 · Ballagrio | Not recorded |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | titanium dioxide, zinc oxide, niacinamide, panthenol, sodium hyaluronate | zinc oxide, titanium dioxide |
| Free ofdiffers | sulfate-free, paraben-free | Not recorded |
| Heads-updiffers | fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed | pregnancy cautionPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Fully parsed · 47 ingredients | Partially captured — 29 of 40 label entries matched, some checks not run |
Key actives · 3 | ||
hyaluronic acid (salt form) | yes | no |
pro-vitamin b5 | yes | no |
vitamin b3 | yes | no |
Rest of the labels · 45 | ||
alumina | yes | no |
bis-ethylhexyloxyphenol methoxyphenyl triazine | no | yes |
butyloctyl salicylate | yes | no |
ceresin | no | yes |
ci 77491 | yes | no |
ci 77492 | yes | no |
ci 77499 | yes | no |
dipropylene glycol | yes | no |
disodium edta | no | yes |
disteardimonium hectorite | yes | no |
drying alcohol | yes | no |
ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate | no | yes |
ethylhexyl palmitate | no | yes |
ethylhexyl salicylate | no | yes |
fragrance | yes | no |
glyceryl caprylate | yes | no |
hydrogen dimethicone | no | yes |
hydrolyzed elastin | no | yes |
hydroxypropyltrimonium hyaluronate | yes | no |
isononyl isononanoate | yes | no |
lauryl peg-10 tris(trimethylsiloxy)silylethyl dimethicone | yes | no |
lecithin | no | yes |
magnesium sulfate | yes | no |
methyl trimethicone | yes | no |
mica | no | yes |
myristic acid | yes | no |
octocrylene | no | yes |
octyldodecanol | no | yes |
palmitic acid | yes | no |
pentaerythrityl tetra-di-t-butyl hydroxyhydrocinnamate | yes | no |
pentylene glycol | yes | no |
phenoxyethanol | no | yes |
polyglyceryl-4 isostearate | yes | no |
polyhydroxystearic acid | yes | no |
polymethyl methacrylate | yes | no |
polymethylsilsesquioxane | yes | no |
potassium hyaluronate | yes | no |
sea water | no | yes |
sodium acetylated hyaluronate | yes | no |
sodium dna | yes | no |
sodium hyaluronate crosspolymer | yes | no |
synthetic fluorphlogopite | yes | no |
ultramarines | no | yes |
vinyl dimethicone | yes | no |
vitamin e | yes | no |
VT Cosmetics's label is only partially captured — rows may grow as parsing completes.
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
Choose Clio if you want Vitamin B3 in the formula.
Choose VT Cosmetics if you want a comparable formula for $5.13 less.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.