Gentle Skin Cleanser vs [BANILA CO] Clean it Zero Kiwi Kale Pore Pack Cleanser 180g
Gentle Skin Cleanser and [BANILA CO] Clean it Zero Kiwi Kale Pore Pack Cleanser 180g share 5 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 5Gentle Skin Cleanser only 3[BANILA CO] Clean it Zero Kiwi Kale Pore Pack Cleanser 180g only 23
![[BANILA CO] Clean it Zero Kiwi Kale Pore Pack Cleanser 180g](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0061%2F7516%2F2486%2Ffiles%2Fbanila-co-clean-it-zero-kiwi-kale-pore-pack-cleanser-180g-01.jpg%3Fv%3D1761891406&w=96&output=webp&q=82&we)
Permalink for this comparison →
Shared formula
16%
- Ingredients in every formula
- 5in both formulas
- Key actives unique to one formula
- 2unique actives
- Ingredient rows compared
- 31rows compared
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.
The formulas, row by row
31 ingredients across 2 labels| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Cleanser · size not on the record | Cleanser · size not on the record |
| Brand origindiffers | American | Korean |
Offers | ||
| Where to buy | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | panthenol, niacinamide | panthenol, niacinamide, allantoin, ascorbic acid |
| Free ofdiffers | fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free | sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free |
| Heads-up | None flagged from the checks we ranPore data not yet reviewed | None flagged from the checks we ranPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Fully parsed · 8 ingredients | Fully parsed · 28 ingredients |
Key actives · 2 | ||
allantoin | no | yes |
vitamin c | no | yes |
Rest of the labels · 24 | ||
1,2-hexanediol | no | yes |
bifida ferment lysate | no | yes |
brassica oleracea acephala leaf extract | no | yes |
butylene glycol | no | yes |
cellulose | no | yes |
cetearyl alcohol | yes | no |
citric acid | no | yes |
coco-betaine | no | yes |
coptis japonica extract | no | yes |
dipropylene glycol | no | yes |
fragrance | no | yes |
fructan | no | yes |
gardenia florida fruit extract | no | yes |
hydroxypropyl starch phosphate | no | yes |
lactobacillus ferment lysate | no | yes |
lactococcus ferment lysate | no | yes |
microcrystalline cellulose | no | yes |
pantolactone | yes | no |
potassium benzoate | no | yes |
sodium c14-16 olefin sulfonate | no | yes |
sodium chloride | no | yes |
vitamin e | no | yes |
water | yes | no |
water | no | yes |
![[BANILA CO] Clean it Zero Kiwi Kale Pore Pack Cleanser 180g](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0061%2F7516%2F2486%2Ffiles%2Fbanila-co-clean-it-zero-kiwi-kale-pore-pack-cleanser-180g-01.jpg%3Fv%3D1761891406&w=320&output=webp&q=82&we)
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
The bottom line
Choose Cetaphil if you avoid fragrance.
Choose Banila Co if you want Allantoin in the formula.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
Focus on an effect
People also compare
- CetaphilCetaphil, Hydrating Foaming Cream Cleanser, Normal to Dry Skin, 8 fl oz (237 ml)
- Banila Co[BANILA CO] Clean it Zero Fig Berry Moisture Pack Cleanser 180g
- Cetaphil[SKINFOOD] Banana PDRN Glow Cream 70ml
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.