celimax Oil Control Light Sunscreen SPF 50+ PA++++ (40ml / 1.35 fl oz) and Poremizing Velvet Finish Sunscreen share 21 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 21celimax Oil Control Light Sunscreen SPF 50+ PA++++ (40ml / 1.35 fl oz) only 15Poremizing Velvet Finish Sunscreen only 29
Permalink for this comparison →
32%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Sunscreen · size not on the record | Sunscreen · size not on the record |
| Brand origindiffers | Not recorded | Korean |
Offers | ||
| Where to buy | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | zinc oxide, niacinamide, titanium dioxide, sodium hyaluronate | zinc oxide, niacinamide, titanium dioxide, centella asiatica extract |
| Free of | fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free | fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free |
| Heads-up | fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed | fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Fully parsed · 36 ingredients | Fully parsed · 50 ingredients |
Key actives · 2 | ||
cica | no | yes |
hyaluronic acid (salt form) | yes | no |
Rest of the labels · 42 | ||
4-terpineol | yes | no |
a silicone | no | yes |
aloe barbadensis leaf extract | no | yes |
aluminum hydroxide | no | yes |
bis-ethylhexyloxyphenol methoxyphenyl triazine | yes | no |
bombax malabaricum flower extract | no | yes |
butylene glycol | no | yes |
c12-15 alkyl benzoate | no | yes |
c9-12 alkane | no | yes |
calcium aluminum borosilicate | yes | no |
cetyl diglyceryl tris(trimethylsiloxy)silylethyl dimethicone | yes | no |
ci 77491 | no | yes |
ci 77492 | no | yes |
ci 77499 | no | yes |
cyclohexasiloxane | yes | no |
dicaprylyl carbonate | yes | no |
dicaprylyl ether | no | yes |
diethylamino hydroxybenzoyl hexyl benzoate | yes | no |
dimethiconol | no | yes |
echium plantagineum seed oil | no | yes |
ethylhexyl triazone | yes | no |
glycerin | no | yes |
lauryl polyglyceryl-3 polydimethylsiloxyethyl dimethicone | no | yes |
methyl trimethicone | no | yes |
neopentyl glycol diethylhexanoate | no | yes |
octyldodecanol | no | yes |
phenyl trimethicone | yes | no |
pinus palustris leaf extract | yes | no |
poly c10-30 alkyl acrylate | no | yes |
polyglyceryl-2 dipolyhydroxystearate | no | yes |
polyglyceryl-6 polyricinoleate | yes | no |
polyhydroxystearic acid | no | yes |
polymethyl methacrylate | no | yes |
polymethylsilsesquioxane | yes | no |
propanediol | no | yes |
pueraria lobata root extract | yes | no |
saccharomyces ferment filtrate | no | yes |
sea salt | no | yes |
sodium potassium aluminum silicate | no | yes |
trisiloxane | no | yes |
ulmus davidiana root extract | yes | no |
vinyl dimethicone | no | yes |
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
Choose Celimax if you want a comparable formula for $6.32 less.
Choose SKIN1004 if you want Cica in the formula.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.