Care:Nel, Anti-Melasma Cica Cream, 1.35 fl oz (40 ml) vs Missha, Chogongjin, Sulbon Jin Dark Spot Correcting Cream, 2.02 fl oz (60 ml)

Care:Nel, Anti-Melasma Cica Cream, 1.35 fl oz (40 ml) and Missha, Chogongjin, Sulbon Jin Dark Spot Correcting Cream, 2.02 fl oz (60 ml) share 16 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

Shared 16Care:Nel, Anti-Melasma Cica Cream, 1.35 fl oz (40 ml) only 12Missha, Chogongjin, Sulbon Jin Dark Spot Correcting Cream, 2.02 fl oz (60 ml) only 31

2 of 6

Permalink for this comparison →

Shared formula

27%

Ingredients in every formula: 16in both formulas
Key actives unique to one formula: 5unique actives
Ingredient rows compared: 59rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.

The formulas, row by row

59 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(43 of 59 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side
on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	Care:Nel Care:Nel, Anti-Melasma Cica Cream, 1.35 fl oz (40 ml) $14.90	Recommended Missha Missha, Chogongjin, Sulbon Jin Dark Spot Correcting Cream, 2.02 fl oz (60 ml) $36.30
Basics
Type & size	Moisturizer · size not on the record	Moisturizer · size not on the record
Brand origindiffers	Not recorded	Korean
Offers
Where to buy	Not recorded	Not recorded
Availability	in stock	in stock
Formula
Key activesdiffers	niacinamide, centella asiatica extract, tranexamic acid	niacinamide, squalane, ceramide np, hyaluronic acid, sodium hyaluronate, tranexamic acid
Free of	sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free	sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free
Heads-up	fragrance allergens · fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed	fragrance allergens · fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Fully parsed · 28 ingredients	Fully parsed · 47 ingredients
Key actives · 5
ceramide np	no	yes
cica	yes	no
hyaluronic acid Pregnancy: generally fine	no	yes
hyaluronic acid (salt form) Pregnancy: generally fine	no	yes
squalane	no	yes
Rest of the labels · 38
a silicone	no	yes
adenosine	no	yes
alpha-isomethyl ionone	no	yes
angelica gigas root extract	no	yes
arachidyl alcohol	no	yes
arachidyl glucoside	no	yes
behenyl alcohol	no	yes
benzyl benzoate	no	yes
benzyl salicylate	no	yes
betaine	no	yes
butylene glycol	no	yes
caprylyl methicone	yes	no
carbomer	yes	no
cetearyl glucoside	no	yes
cetyl ethylhexanoate	no	yes
citric acid	no	yes
cornus officinalis fruit extract	no	yes
cyclopentasiloxane	no	yes
eugenol	no	yes
farnesol	yes	no
glucose	no	yes
glyceryl stearate citrate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
hydrogenated lecithin	no	yes
hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid Pregnancy: generally fine	no	yes
hydroxycitronellal	no	yes
isoeugenol	no	yes
madecassoside	yes	no
myristic acid Fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
palmitic acid Fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
panax ginseng root extract	no	yes
pearl extract	no	yes
peg-100 stearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
polyglyceryl-3 distearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
sodium citrate	no	yes
sorbitan isostearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
sorbitan oleate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
stearic acid Fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
tromethamine	yes	no

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose Care:Nel if you want Cica in the formula.

Choose Missha if you want Squalane in the formula.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

This is not medical advice.

Focus on an effect

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spots Clear breakouts Smooth fine lines Hydrate & plump

Calm redness Refine texture Repair & strengthen Protect from sun

People also compare

More suggestions →

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.