[beplain] Cicaterol Hyaluronic Deep Cleansing Foam 120ml and Vt cosmetics Cica Mild Facial Cleansing Foam - 300 ml share 13 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 13[beplain] Cicaterol Hyaluronic Deep Cleansing Foam 120ml only 31Vt cosmetics Cica Mild Facial Cleansing Foam - 300 ml only 12
Permalink for this comparison →
23%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Cleanser · size not on the record | Cleanser · size not on the record |
| Brand origindiffers | Not recorded | Korean |
Offers | ||
| Where to buy | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Availabilitydiffers | Not recorded | in stock |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | salicylic acid, centella asiatica extract, ceramide np, sodium hyaluronate, hyaluronic acid | centella asiatica extract, sodium hyaluronate |
| Free ofdiffers | fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free | sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free |
| Heads-updiffers | pregnancy caution · photosensitizing · fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag | fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Fully parsed · 44 ingredients | Fully parsed · 25 ingredients |
Key actives · 3 | ||
bha exfoliant | yes | no |
ceramide np | yes | no |
hyaluronic acid | yes | no |
Rest of the labels · 40 | ||
acrylates copolymer | yes | no |
asiatic acid | no | yes |
asiaticoside | no | yes |
beta-glucan | yes | no |
butylene glycol | yes | no |
carbomer | yes | no |
centella asiatica leaf extract | yes | no |
cocamidopropyl betaine | no | yes |
dimethylsilanol hyaluronate | yes | no |
disodium edta | no | yes |
enantia chlorantha bark extract | yes | no |
ethylhexylglycerin | yes | no |
fragrance | no | yes |
freesia refracta extract | no | yes |
glyceryl stearate | yes | no |
hydrogenated lecithin | yes | no |
hydrolyzed sodium hyaluronate | yes | no |
hydroxypropyltrimonium hyaluronate | yes | no |
lauryl betaine | yes | no |
madecassic acid | no | yes |
madecassoside | no | yes |
methylpropanediol | yes | no |
monarda didyma leaf extract | no | yes |
oleanolic acid | yes | no |
palmitic acid | yes | no |
peg-100 stearate | no | yes |
peg-14m | no | yes |
phytosterols | yes | no |
pinus palustris leaf extract | yes | no |
polyglyceryl-4 caprate | yes | no |
potassium hyaluronate | yes | no |
potassium laurate | yes | no |
propolis extract | no | yes |
pueraria lobata root extract | yes | no |
sodium benzoate | yes | no |
sodium chloride | yes | no |
sodium hyaluronate crosspolymer | yes | no |
sodium hyaluronate dimethylsilanol | yes | no |
sorbitan olivate | yes | no |
ulmus davidiana root extract | yes | no |
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
Choose Beplain if you want BHA exfoliant in the formula.
Choose VT Cosmetics if you want this formula as listed.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.