Your cookie choices

How optional tracking is used

Essential storage keeps sign-in, your bag and requested features working. With your permission, optional analytics, sampled session replay, error reports and affiliate tools help us understand and improve the site.

You can use the site without optional tracking and change your choice from the footer. Read the cookie details.

Daily Tinted Fluid Sunscreen DP320 vs [AHC] Masters Tone Up Sun Serum SPF 50+ PA++++ 50ml

Daily Tinted Fluid Sunscreen DP320 and [AHC] Masters Tone Up Sun Serum SPF 50+ PA++++ 50ml share 10 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

Shared 10Daily Tinted Fluid Sunscreen DP320 only 19[AHC] Masters Tone Up Sun Serum SPF 50+ PA++++ 50ml only 59

Clear all2 of 8

Permalink for this comparison →

Full comparison

Loading product details…

Full ingredient comparisonLabels, evidence & retailer offers

Shared formula

11%

Ingredients in every formula: 10in both formulas
Key actives unique to one formula: 7unique actives
Ingredient rows compared: 88rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows. Partial captures footnoted under the board.

The formulas, row by row

88 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(78 of 88 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side
on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	Beauty of Joseon Daily Tinted Fluid Sunscreen DP320 $10.00 Reference price	Recommended Ahc [AHC] Masters Tone Up Sun Serum SPF 50+ PA++++ 50ml $20.61 $20.61 at Ballagrio ↗
Basics
Type & size	Sunscreen · size not on the record	Sunscreen · size not on the record
Brand origindiffers	Korean	Not recorded
Offers
Where to buydiffers	No offers listed	$20.61 · Ballagrio
Availabilitydiffers	No offers listed	In stock
Formula
Key activesdiffers	zinc oxide	zinc oxide, niacinamide, titanium dioxide, ceramide np, sodium hyaluronate, panthenol, hyaluronic acid, ascorbic acid
Free ofdiffers	fragrance-free, sulfate-free, paraben-free, silicone-free	Not recorded
Heads-updiffers	fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag	None flagged from the checks we ranPore data not yet reviewed
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Fully parsed · 29 ingredients	Partially captured — 69 of 137 label entries matched, some checks not run
Key actives · 7
ceramide np	no	yes
hyaluronic acid Pregnancy: generally fine	no	yes
hyaluronic acid (salt form) Pregnancy: generally fine	no	yes
pro-vitamin b5	no	yes
titanium dioxide Pregnancy: generally fine	no	yes
vitamin b3	no	yes
vitamin c	no	yes
Rest of the labels · 71
1,2-hexanediol	yes	no
a silicone	no	yes
adenosine	no	yes
aluminum hydroxide	no	yes
arginine	no	yes
artemisia capillaris extract	yes	no
ascorbyl palmitate Pregnancy: generally fine Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
ascorbyl tetraisopalmitate Pregnancy: generally fine Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
bamboo vinegar	no	yes
c12-15 alkyl benzoate	yes	no
c9-12 alkane	no	yes
caesalpinia spinosa fruit extract	no	yes
calcium carbonate	no	yes
caprylyl methicone	no	yes
carbomer	no	yes
chitosan	no	yes
cholesterol	no	yes
ci 77499	yes	no
coco-caprylate	yes	no
cystine	no	yes
dimethiconol	no	yes
diphenylsiloxy phenyl trimethicone	no	yes
dipropylene glycol	no	yes
disteardimonium hectorite	no	yes
drying alcohol	yes	no
erythritol	no	yes
ethylhexyl isononanoate	yes	no
ethylhexyl methoxycrylene	no	yes
ethylhexylglycerin	no	yes
fragrance	no	yes
glutamine	no	yes
glycerin	no	yes
glycine	no	yes
hippophae rhamnoides fruit extract	no	yes
hydrogenated lecithin	no	yes
hydrogenated olive oil unsaponifiables	yes	no
hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid Pregnancy: generally fine	no	yes
hydrolyzed sodium hyaluronate Pregnancy: generally fine	no	yes
hydroxyacetophenone	yes	no
hydroxypropyltrimonium hyaluronate Pregnancy: generally fine	no	yes
isododecane	no	yes
isopropyl myristate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
kappaphycus alvarezii extract	no	yes
lauryl polyglyceryl-3 polydimethylsiloxyethyl dimethicone	no	yes
magnesium sulfate	no	yes
methyl trimethicone	no	yes
methylpropanediol	no	yes
neopentyl glycol diheptanoate	yes	no
octyldodecanol	no	yes
pentylene glycol	no	yes
polyglyceryl-10 laurate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
polyglyceryl-2 dipolyhydroxystearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
polyglyceryl-3 polydimethylsiloxyethyl dimethicone	no	yes
polyglyceryl-3 polyricinoleate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
polyglyceryl-4 isostearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
polyglyceryl-6 polyhydroxystearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
polyglyceryl-6 polyricinoleate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
potassium hyaluronate Pregnancy: generally fine	no	yes
propylheptyl caprylate	no	yes
saccharomyces ferment filtrate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
silica	yes	no
sodium acetylated hyaluronate Pregnancy: generally fine	no	yes
sodium hyaluronate crosspolymer Pregnancy: generally fine	no	yes
sorbitol	no	yes
stearalkonium hectorite	yes	no
tridecane	yes	no
triethoxycaprylylsilane	no	yes
trimethylsiloxysilicate	no	yes
trisiloxane	no	yes
trisodium ethylenediamine disuccinate	no	yes
undecane	yes	no

Ahc's label is only partially captured — rows may grow as parsing completes.

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose Beauty of Joseon if you want a comparable formula for $10.61 less.

Choose Ahc if you want Vitamin B3 in the formula.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

This is not medical advice.

Focus on an effect

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spots Clear breakouts Smooth fine lines Hydrate & plump

Calm redness Refine texture Repair & strengthen Protect from sun

Related formula comparisons

More suggestions →

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.