[Arocell] Super Collagen Booster Serum 70ml and numbuzin No.2 Rose PDRN Collagen 2X Plumping Serum (30ml / 1.01 fl oz) share 15 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 15[Arocell] Super Collagen Booster Serum 70ml only 17numbuzin No.2 Rose PDRN Collagen 2X Plumping Serum (30ml / 1.01 fl oz) only 27
Permalink for this comparison →
25%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows. Partial captures footnoted under the board.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Serum · size not on the record | Serum · size not on the record |
| Brand origindiffers | Not recorded | Korean |
Offers | ||
| Where to buydiffers | $21.10 · Ballagrio | Not recorded |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | niacinamide, sodium hyaluronate, centella asiatica extract, hyaluronic acid, sodium ascorbyl phosphate | niacinamide, hyaluronic acid, sodium ascorbyl phosphate |
| Free ofdiffers | fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free | Not recorded |
| Heads-updiffers | fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed | None flagged from the checks we ranPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Fully parsed · 32 ingredients | Partially captured — 42 of 93 label entries matched, some checks not run |
Key actives · 2 | ||
cica | yes | no |
hyaluronic acid (salt form) | yes | no |
Rest of the labels · 42 | ||
artemisia capillaris extract | no | yes |
benzyl glycol | no | yes |
betaine | yes | no |
butylene glycol | yes | no |
camellia sinensis leaf extract | no | yes |
caprylyl glycol | no | yes |
citric acid | yes | no |
collagen water | no | yes |
coptis chinensis root extract | no | yes |
cyanocobalamin | no | yes |
diphenyl dimethicone | yes | no |
dipropylene glycol | no | yes |
gardenia florida fruit extract | no | yes |
glucose | yes | no |
hydrolyzed collagen | no | yes |
hydrolyzed collagen extract | yes | no |
hydrolyzed glycosaminoglycans | no | yes |
hydrolyzed sodium hyaluronate | yes | no |
hydrolyzed sponge | no | yes |
hydroxypropyltrimonium hyaluronate | yes | no |
lactobacillus ferment | yes | no |
malus domestica fruit extract | yes | no |
morus alba bark extract | no | yes |
octyldodecanol | no | yes |
panax ginseng root protoplasts | yes | no |
peg-240 | no | yes |
pentaerythrityl tetraisostearate | no | yes |
polylactic acid | no | yes |
potassium hyaluronate | yes | no |
potassium laurate | no | yes |
propylene carbonate | no | yes |
pullulan | no | yes |
raspberry ketone | no | yes |
resveratrol | no | yes |
rosa damascena flower extract | no | yes |
sodium citrate | yes | no |
sodium dna | no | yes |
sodium hyaluronate crosspolymer | no | yes |
stearalkonium hectorite | no | yes |
triethylhexanoin | yes | no |
vitamin e | no | yes |
xanthan gum | yes | no |
numbuzin's label is only partially captured — rows may grow as parsing completes.
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
Choose Arocell if you want Cica in the formula.
Choose numbuzin if you want a comparable formula for $27.89 less.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.