[Arocell] Super Collagen Ampoule Pack To Foam Cleanser 120g and Torriden Cellmazing Pore Perfecting Ampoule (30ml / 1.01 fl oz) share 13 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 13[Arocell] Super Collagen Ampoule Pack To Foam Cleanser 120g only 36Torriden Cellmazing Pore Perfecting Ampoule (30ml / 1.01 fl oz) only 9
Permalink for this comparison →
22%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows. Partial captures footnoted under the board.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Serum · size not on the record | Serum · size not on the record |
| Brand origindiffers | Not recorded | Korean |
Offers | ||
| Where to buydiffers | $41.30 · Ballagrio | Not recorded |
Formula | ||
| Key actives | sodium hyaluronate, niacinamide | niacinamide, sodium hyaluronate |
| Free ofdiffers | Not recorded | fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free |
| Heads-updiffers | None flagged from the checks we ranPore data not yet reviewed | pregnancy cautionPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Partially captured — 49 of 107 label entries matched, some checks not run | Fully parsed · 22 ingredients |
Rest of the labels · 45 | ||
adenosine | no | yes |
algin | yes | no |
aloe barbadensis leaf extract | yes | no |
beta-glucan | no | yes |
biotin | no | yes |
camellia sinensis leaf extract | yes | no |
capryloyl salicylic acid | no | yes |
coconut acid | yes | no |
collagen extract | no | yes |
dextrin | yes | no |
dioscorea japonica root extract | yes | no |
dipropylene glycol | no | yes |
disodium edta | yes | no |
folic acid | yes | no |
fragrance | yes | no |
gardenia florida fruit extract | yes | no |
glucomannan | yes | no |
haematococcus pluvialis extract | yes | no |
hippophae rhamnoides fruit extract | yes | no |
hydrolyzed collagen extract | yes | no |
hydroxyacetophenone | yes | no |
lactobacillus ferment filtrate | yes | no |
laminaria japonica extract | yes | no |
mentha rotundifolia leaf extract | yes | no |
methylpropanediol | no | yes |
nicotinamide mononucleotide | yes | no |
palmitic acid | yes | no |
pantothenic acid | yes | no |
pinus palustris leaf extract | yes | no |
polyglutamic acid | yes | no |
pueraria lobata root extract | yes | no |
riboflavin | yes | no |
sodium c14-16 olefin sulfonate | yes | no |
sodium chloride | yes | no |
sodium cocoyl glycinate | yes | no |
sodium cocoyl isethionate | yes | no |
sodium isethionate | yes | no |
sodium polyacrylate | yes | no |
soluble collagen | yes | no |
stearic acid | yes | no |
ulmus davidiana root extract | yes | no |
viola mandshurica flower extract | yes | no |
vitamin e | no | yes |
water | yes | no |
xylitol | no | yes |
Arocell's label is only partially captured — rows may grow as parsing completes.
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
Choose Arocell if you want this formula as listed.
Choose Torriden if you want a comparable formula for $26.77 less.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.