Arocell Mela TXA Dark Spot Toning Patch 3.0g 5ea vs SUNGBOON EDITOR Active Marine Astaxanthin Vita Toning Whipping Foam 120g

Arocell Mela TXA Dark Spot Toning Patch 3.0g 5ea and SUNGBOON EDITOR Active Marine Astaxanthin Vita Toning Whipping Foam 120g share 10 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

• 
  Arocell Mela TXA Dark Spot Toning Patch 3.0g 5ea
• 
  SUNGBOON EDITOR Active Marine Astaxanthin Vita Toning Whipping Foam 120g

Clear allAdd product2 of 8

Permalink for this comparison →

FitFormulaValueUse together

Full comparison

Loading product details…

Full ingredient comparisonLabels, evidence & retailer offers

How much do the ingredient lists overlap?

13%

Ingredients in every formula

10in both formulas

Key actives unique to one formula

13unique actives

Ingredient rows compared

80rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.

How do the ingredient lists differ?

80 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(70 of 80 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side

on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	Arocell Arocell Mela TXA Dark Spot Toning Patch 3.0g 5ea $39.00 Reference price Save	Recommended Sungboon Editor SUNGBOON EDITOR Active Marine Astaxanthin Vita Toning Whipping Foam 120g $25.00 Reference price Save
Basics
Type & size	Toner · size not on the record	Toner · size not on the record
Brand origindiffers	Not recorded	Korean
Offers
Where to buy	No offers listed	No offers listed
Availability	No offers listed	No offers listed
Formula
Key activesdiffers	niacinamide, allantoin, tranexamic acid, kojic acid, alpha-arbutin, arbutin, retinol, ascorbic acid	centella asiatica extract, niacinamide, ceramide np, allantoin, panthenol, sodium hyaluronate, squalane, hyaluronic acid, argania spinosa kernel oil
Free of	fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free	fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free
Heads-updiffers	pregnancy caution · photosensitizing · fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed	fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Fully parsed · 43 ingredients	Fully parsed · 47 ingredients
Key actives · 13
alpha-arbutin Pregnancy: caution	yes	no
arbutin Pregnancy: caution	yes	no
argan oil	no	yes
ceramide np	no	yes
cica	no	yes
hyaluronic acid Pregnancy: generally fine	no	yes
hyaluronic acid (salt form) Pregnancy: generally fine	no	yes
kojic acid Pregnancy: caution	yes	no
pro-vitamin b5	no	yes
squalane	no	yes
tranexamic acid	yes	no
vitamin a	yes	no
vitamin c	yes	no
Rest of the labels · 57
agar	yes	no
althaea rosea flower extract	no	yes
artemisia vulgaris extract	no	yes
astaxanthin	no	yes
azulene	yes	no
bambusa vulgaris extract	no	yes
benzyl glycol	no	yes
beta-glucan	no	yes
betaine	no	yes
bisabolol	yes	no
boron nitride	yes	no
capryloyl salicylic acid Pregnancy: caution	yes	no
carrageenan	yes	no
cellulose gum	yes	no
collagen amino acids	yes	no
collagen extract	yes	no
dipotassium glycyrrhizate	yes	no
eclipta prostrata extract	no	yes
ethylhexylglycerin	yes	no
gellan gum	yes	no
glucomannan	yes	no
gluconolactone	yes	no
glyceryl stearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid Pregnancy: generally fine	no	yes
hydrolyzed sodium hyaluronate Pregnancy: generally fine	no	yes
hydroxyacetophenone	yes	no
lactobacillus	yes	no
laminaria japonica extract	no	yes
lauric acid Fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
lecithin	yes	no
milk exosomes	yes	no
myristic acid Fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
palmitic acid Fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
pentylene glycol	no	yes
polyacrylic acid	yes	no
polyglyceryl-10 oleate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
portulaca oleracea extract	no	yes
potassium chloride	yes	no
potassium hydroxide	no	yes
propanediol	no	yes
prunella vulgaris extract	yes	no
rosmarinus officinalis extract	no	yes
sodium acetylated hyaluronate Pregnancy: generally fine	no	yes
sodium hyaluronate crosspolymer Pregnancy: generally fine	no	yes
sodium pca	no	yes
sodium polyacrylate	yes	no
sodium polyglutamate	no	yes
sorbitan stearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
stearic acid Fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
sucrose	yes	no
tocopheryl acetate	no	yes
trehalose	no	yes
ubiquinone	yes	no
ulmus davidiana root extract	no	yes
vitamin e	no	yes
xanthan gum	yes	no
xylitol	yes	no

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose Arocell if you want Tranexamic Acid in the formula.

Choose Sungboon Editor if you want Cica in the formula.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

This is not medical advice.

Focus on an effect

Focus on an effect

All ingredientsBrighten & fade dark spotsClear breakoutsSmooth fine linesHydrate & plumpCalm rednessRefine textureRepair & strengthenProtect from sunGo

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spotsClear breakoutsSmooth fine linesHydrate & plump

Calm rednessRefine textureRepair & strengthenProtect from sun

Related formula comparisons

More suggestions →

• ArocellVS[goodal] Green Tangerine Vita C Toning Cleansing Balm 110ml
• Sungboon EditorVSNacific, Uyu Cream Toner, 5.07 fl oz (150 ml)
• ArocellVSCHARMZONE Top Class Advanced Lifting Gel Skin 120ml

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.