Lip Repair vs flavored ceramide lip blur balm

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side

on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	shot Aquaphor Lip Repair Save	Recommended Cocokind flavored ceramide lip blur balm $12.00 $12.00 at Cocokind ↗Save
Basics
Type & size	Lip care · size not on the record	Lip care · size not on the record
Brand origindiffers	Not recorded	American
Offers
Where to buydiffers	Not recorded	$12.00 · Cocokind
Formula
Key activesdiffers	panthenol, sodium ascorbyl phosphate	ceramide np, titanium dioxide
Free of	Not recorded	Not recorded
Heads-up	None flagged from the checks we ranPore data not yet reviewed	None flagged from the checks we ranPore data not yet reviewed
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Partially captured — 13 of 18 label entries matched, some checks not run	Partially captured — 26 of 77 label entries matched, some checks not run
Key actives · 4
ceramide np	no	yes
pro-vitamin b5	yes	no
sodium ascorbyl phosphate Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
titanium dioxide Pregnancy: generally fine	no	yes
Rest of the labels · 27
aroma	no	yes
beeswax	yes	no
bisabolol	yes	no
c18-38 alkyl hydroxystearoyl stearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
c20-40 alkyl stearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
calcium aluminum borosilicate	no	yes
ceramide ap	no	yes
ci 15850	no	yes
ci 45410	no	yes
ci 77163	no	yes
ci 77491	no	yes
ci 77492	no	yes
ethylhexyl palmitate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
fragrance	no	yes
isostearyl isostearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
magnesium stearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
magnesium sulfate	yes	no
mica	no	yes
octyldodecanol	yes	no
polyglyceryl-3 polyricinoleate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
portulaca pilosa extract	no	yes
silica	no	yes
sorbitan isostearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
stearalkonium hectorite	no	yes
sucrose cocoate	no	yes
tin oxide	no	yes
vanillin	no	yes

Aquaphor and Cocokind have labels only partially captured — rows may grow as parsing completes.

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.