AESTURA Regederm 365 Retinoid Eye Serum 15ml vs Mary & May, Tranexamic Acid + Glutathione Eye Cream, 1.05 oz (30 g)

AESTURA Regederm 365 Retinoid Eye Serum 15ml and Mary & May, Tranexamic Acid + Glutathione Eye Cream, 1.05 oz (30 g) share 15 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

Shared 15AESTURA Regederm 365 Retinoid Eye Serum 15ml only 29Mary & May, Tranexamic Acid + Glutathione Eye Cream, 1.05 oz (30 g) only 15

2 of 6

Permalink for this comparison →

Shared formula

25%

Ingredients in every formula: 15in both formulas
Key actives unique to one formula: 2unique actives
Ingredient rows compared: 59rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.

The formulas, row by row

59 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(44 of 59 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side
on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	Aestura AESTURA Regederm 365 Retinoid Eye Serum 15ml $53.55 $53.55 at Kbeautymakeup ↗	Recommended Mary & May Mary & May, Tranexamic Acid + Glutathione Eye Cream, 1.05 oz (30 g) $16.40
Basics
Type & size	Eye cream · size not on the record	Eye cream · size not on the record
Brand origindiffers	Not recorded	Korean
Offers
Where to buydiffers	$53.55 · Kbeautymakeup	Not recorded
Availabilitydiffers	Not recorded	in stock
Formula
Key activesdiffers	niacinamide, panthenol, sodium hyaluronate	niacinamide, tranexamic acid, panthenol, sodium hyaluronate, ascorbic acid
Free ofdiffers	fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free	sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free
Heads-updiffers	pregnancy caution · fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag	fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Fully parsed · 44 ingredients	Fully parsed · 30 ingredients
Key actives · 2
tranexamic acid	no	yes
vitamin c	no	yes
Rest of the labels · 42
1,2-hexanediol	yes	no
3-o-ethyl ascorbic acid Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
beeswax	no	yes
cellulose gum	yes	no
cholesterol	yes	no
dimethyl isosorbide	yes	no
dipropylene glycol	no	yes
disodium edta	no	yes
ethylhexyl palmitate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
ethylhexyl stearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
ethylhexylglycerin	yes	no
fragrance	no	yes
glucosyl hesperidin	yes	no
glutathione	no	yes
glycerin	yes	no
glyceryl caprylate	yes	no
glyceryl polymethacrylate	yes	no
glycol stearate se Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
hippophae rhamnoides fruit oil	no	yes
hydrogenated polydecene	no	yes
hydroxyacetophenone	no	yes
hydroxypinacolone retinoate Pregnancy: avoid	yes	no
hydroxypropyl bispalmitamide mea	yes	no
isododecane	no	yes
lauric acid Fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
mannitol	yes	no
myristic acid Fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
oleanolic acid	yes	no
palmitic acid Fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
pectin	yes	no
polyglyceryl-10 laurate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
polyglyceryl-2 stearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
polyglyceryl-3 methylglucose distearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
polyglyceryl-6 caprylate	yes	no
pullulan	yes	no
silica	yes	no
sodium hydroxide	yes	no
sodium metaphosphate	yes	no
stearyl alcohol	no	yes
thymol trimethoxycinnamate	yes	no
tromethamine	yes	no
water	yes	no

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose Aestura if you avoid fragrance.

Choose Mary & May if you want Tranexamic Acid in the formula.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

This is not medical advice.

Focus on an effect

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spots Clear breakouts Smooth fine lines Hydrate & plump

Calm redness Refine texture Repair & strengthen Protect from sun

People also compare

More suggestions →

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.